4.5 Article

Testing the three hypotheses about the relationships between ability and personality: 25 years later

Journal

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112473

Keywords

Intelligence; Personality; Differentiation; Neuroticism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the relationship between intelligence and personality using responses from applicants to teacher training studies. The findings indicate that there is no consistent variation in personality responses among individuals with higher intelligence, but individuals with higher neuroticism have higher inter-scale correlations for intelligence measures. Additionally, the study also suggests that intelligence can impact the structure of multiscale personality measures, as lower intelligence scores are associated with higher inter-scale correlations for personality scales.
Utilizing responses given by 6256 applicants to teacher training studies at several Austrian colleges and universities, this study attempts to replicate the three tests by Austin et al. (1997) examining the possible relationships between intelligence and personality. The results did not support the Differentiation of Personality by Intelligence Hypothesis as individuals who scored higher in intelligence were not consistently more variable in their personality responses. The results did provide support for the Differentiation of Intelligence by Neuroticism Hypothesis as individuals who scored higher in neuroticism had higher inter-scale correlations for the intelligence measure. In addition, the results also demonstrated that inter-scale correlations for personality scales were higher for those who scored lower in intelligence, suggesting that intelligence can impact the structure of multiscale personality measures. The limitations and future directions are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available