4.7 Article

Urban rewilding: Human-wildlife relations in Genoa, NW Italy

Journal

CITIES
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104660

Keywords

Urban wildlife; Wild boar; Genoa; Italy; Survey

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, urban wildlife presence has been increasing in cities globally, leading to increased human-animal interactions. The city of Genoa in Italy serves as a complex case study, where rural depopulation and spontaneous rewilding have caused various animal species to approach urban areas for new spaces. This study explores the residents' perceptions and understanding of urban wildlife in relation to the geography of Genoa, specifically focusing on wild boars, based on survey data. The findings indicate that certain areas of the city have higher levels of wildlife interaction, influencing the perception and tolerance towards these phenomena. Moreover, there is no clear opposition towards urban wildlife, and residents express concern for sustainable urban planning that benefits both humans and wildlife.
In recent years, the presence of urban wildlife has increased in many cities around the world, with the consequent increase of human-animal relations. The city of Genoa (NW Italy) is a particularly complex case study where such phenomena are associated with rural depopulation of the surrounding countryside and spontaneous rewilding processes that have led several animal species to approach urban areas in search of new spaces. This paper deals with human-wildlife interactions in Genoa in relation to the geography of the city by way of a survey circulated throughout Genoa. Drawing from survey data, the research investigates residents' perceptions and understanding of urban wildlife in relation to their area of residency with a focus on wild boars. People's responses show that some areas of the city have a higher level of interaction with wildlife, and this partly affects the way in which such phenomena are perceived and tolerated by the population. In addition, the results show that there is no clear opposition towards urban wildlife and that people are concerned about sustainable forms of urban planning to the benefit of both residents and wildlife.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available