4.5 Article

The Role of Exsolved Fluids on the Mo Isotopic Composition of Arc Lavas: Insights From the Adakitic Rocks of Solander Volcano

Journal

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023GC011172

Keywords

adakites; subduction zones; fluid exsolution; fluid unmixing; brine assimilation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of source and magmatic differentiation on the Molybdenum isotopic composition (delta 98/95Mo) of lavas from Solander volcano were investigated. The study suggests that the extreme delta 98/95Mo variation in the lavas is mainly caused by magmatic differentiation processes, such as fluid loss, unmixing, and assimilation. The role of magmatic fluids in controlling the delta 98/95Mo of volcanic arc rocks should be considered in source assessments.
The Molybdenum isotopic composition (delta 98/95Mo) of arc lavas is highly variable. While source processes play an important role in controlling the delta 98/95Mo of arc magmas, the impact of differentiation on this variability remains poorly understood. In this study, we assess and deconvolute the effects of source and crustal processes on the delta 98/95Mo of lavas and enclaves with adakitic compositions from Solander volcano, located above the incipient Puysegur subduction zone. These rocks show extreme delta 98/95Mo variation (-0.35 parts per thousand to +0.79 parts per thousand). The most mafic samples have light delta 98/95Mo (-0.35 parts per thousand to -0.29 parts per thousand) and low Mo/Ce ratios (0.006-0.007) consistent with published models invoking the addition of altered oceanic crust melts to their mantle source. However, the range of delta 98/95Mo in the rest of the sample set is unlikely to result from source processes. Covariations of delta 98/95Mo and Mo contents with MgO concentrations indicate that the delta 98/95Mo and Mo content variability was generated during differentiation. Similar Sr-Nd isotope compositions of all Solander lavas exclude a significant role for crustal assimilation. Mineral fractionation alone cannot reproduce the observed systematics without invoking unreasonable delta 98/95Mo for the fractionated phases. Instead, we suggest that Mo mobility and associated isotopic fractionation during supercritical fluid exsolution and unmixing, followed by brine assimilation and magma mixing, are the first order controls on delta 98/95Mo and Mo concentration variation in the Solander adakitic magmas. Thus, the role of magmatic fluids on the delta 98/95Mo of intermediate-silicic arc rocks can be significant, at least in adakitic systems, and needs to be considered prior to a source assessment. The Molybdenum isotopic composition (delta 98/95Mo) of volcanic arc lavas is highly variable. While mantle source processes play an important role in controlling the delta 98/95Mo of arc lavas, the impact of magmatic differentiation (dominantly occurring at crustal levels) on this variability remains poorly understood. In this study, we assess and deconvolute the effects of source and crustal processes on the delta 98/95Mo of lavas and enclaves with adakitic compositions (a type of volcanic arc rock with high Sr/Y, La/Yb, and low Y and HREE contents) from Solander volcano, located above the incipient Puysegur subduction zone. These rocks show extreme delta 98/95Mo variation. We show that, apart from the delta 98/95Mo of the most mafic samples that are consistent with previously inferred mantle source processes at Solander volcano, the range of delta 98/95Mo in the rest of the sample set is best explained by magmatic differentiation effects. We suggest that most of the delta 98/95Mo variability in Solander lavas reflects the effects of fluid loss from the magma as well as the unmixing of that fluid into brine (high-density and high-salinity fluid) and vapor (low-density and low-salinity fluid) and the assimilation of brine by magma located at the roof of the chamber. The range of Mo isotopic compositions of the Solander adakitic rocks is extremeMost of this variation was created during magmatic differentiation but does not result from mineral fractionation or crustal assimilationMo isotope fractionation during supercritical fluid exsolution and unmixing followed by brine assimilation led to the isotopic variability

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available