4.7 Article

Operational policies and performance analysis for overhead robotic compact warehousing systems with bin reshuffling

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2289643

Keywords

Facility logistics; robotic warehouse; performance evaluation; queuing; machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies a novel robotic warehousing system that can free up floor space occupation at a low cost. By proposing a nested queuing network model and using reinforcement learning, the reshuffling efficiency of the system is improved. The study also finds that the storage policy affects the system's performance.
This paper studies a novel robotic warehousing system called the overhead robotic compact storage and retrieval system, which can free up the floor space occupation at a low cost. Bins, as basic storage containers, are stacked on top of each other to form a bin stack. Along overhead tracks, bin-picking robots transport bins between storage/retrieval positions and workstations with the aid of track-changing robots. Little research has been done to study operational policies and performance analysis for this new robotic compact warehousing system. We propose a nested queuing network model that considers two transportation resources and performs reinforcement learning using real data to improve the reshuffling efficiency. We find that reinforcement learning based reshuffling policy greatly reduces the reshuffling distance and saves computation time compared to existing policies. We find that the storage policy of stacks affects the optimal width/length ratio regardless of the system height. Interestingly, we obtain the number of robots that can stabilise the system to avoid an explosion of the order queue; two more robots than that number will produce relatively low throughput times. Compared to an AutoStore system, using our system reduces cost by 30% with a slight increase in throughput time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available