4.6 Article

The detection of Japanese encephalitis virus in municipal wastewater during an acute disease outbreak

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxad275

Keywords

Arbovirus; Flavivirus; wastewater-based surveillance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) to detect cases of Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) infection. The study finds that JEV was detected in wastewater samples collected during a disease outbreak, highlighting the potential value of WBS as a complementary layer to existing monitoring efforts.
Aim To demonstrate the capability of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) as a tool for detecting potential cases of Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) infection in the community.Methods and results In this study, we explore the potential of WBS to detect cases of JEV infection by leveraging from an established SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance program. We describe the use of two reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR) assays targeting JEV to screen archived samples from two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). JEV was detected in wastewater samples collected during a timeframe coinciding with a cluster of acute human encephalitis cases, alongside concurrent evidence of JEV detection in mosquito surveillance and the sentinel chicken programs within South Australia's Riverland and Murraylands regions.Conclusions Current surveillance measures for JEV encounter multiple constraints, which may miss the early stages of JEV circulation or fail to capture the full extent of transmission. The detection of JEV in wastewater during a disease outbreak highlights the potential WBS has as a complementary layer to existing monitoring efforts forming part of the One Health approach required for optimal disease response and control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available