4.3 Article

Gender Categorization and Stereotypes Beyond the Binary

Journal

SEX ROLES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-023-01437-y

Keywords

Gender non-conformity; TGNC; Social categorization; Gender stereotypes; Gender nonbinary; Transgender; Stimulus ambiguity; Gender categorization; Gender diverse; Face categorization; Gender expression; Gendered occupation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gender categorization and stereotyping can lead to discrimination. This study investigates the categorization and stereotyping of gender-ambiguous targets based on facial features and behavioral information. The findings suggest that face is the most influential factor for categorization, with unambiguous faces being mostly categorized as male or female. However, when faces are ambiguous, additional information significantly affects categorization, leading to a higher likelihood of nonbinary categorization.
Gender categorization and stereotyping can lead to discrimination. Researchers have mostly studied cisgender, gender-conforming individuals as the targets when examining these processes. In two factorial survey experiments, we investigated gender categorization and stereotyping of gender-ambiguous targets based on facial features and behavioral information. We manipulated femininity/masculinity/ambiguity of face, expression, and occupation. Participants completed a gender categorization task, and stereotype and attitude measures. The findings indicated that face was most influential for categorization: When face was unambiguously masculine or feminine, participants mostly categorized targets as male or female, respectively. In these cases, expression and occupation had little influence on categorization. When face was ambiguous, this additional information significantly influenced categorization. Nonbinary categorization was more likely for ambiguous faces, and most likely for ambiguous faces combined with ambiguous expression and ambiguous or feminine occupation. Our findings suggest that categorizing gender-ambiguous targets is more complex compared to clearly gendered targets. Primarily relying on face when it appears clearly gendered likely causes categorization errors when encountering TGNC individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available