4.1 Article

Strike Cover, Consultation and Quashing: An Analysis of R. (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen) v Secretary of State

Journal

INDUSTRIAL LAW JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwad028

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the UK Government's enactment of Regulations in June 2022 and the subsequent unlawful decision-making process leading to the quashing of the Regulations by the High Court.
In June 2022, the UK Government enacted Regulations purporting to remove the offence of introducing or supplying workers to cover those on strike. In R. (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen) v Secretary of State the High Court held that the decision-making process preceding the enactment of the Regulations was unlawful and quashed them. This analysis outlines the case, with a particular focus on the central role played by the existence of a statutory duty to consult in the court's reasoning and the extent to which third party interests were considered in the course of determining the proper remedy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available