4.2 Review

LGBTQ Microaggression on the Campus: A Systematic Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCHOOL VIOLENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2289107

Keywords

Campus; discrimination; intersectionality; LGBTQ; microaggression; students

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviews the existing literature on LGBTQ microaggression on campus, identifying multiple forms of microaggression that LGBTQ students experience in educational institutions, including environmental and interpersonal forms. These microaggressions negatively impact their academic outcomes and mental health. Intersectionality further contributes to their vulnerability to experiencing microaggression.
Microaggression experienced by LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and having other sexual orientations and gender identities) persons have been exhaustively studied over the last decade. However, there is a dearth of psychological research examining the prevalence, forms, and consequences of LGBTQ microaggression in educational institutions. The current study systematically reviews the existing literature that deals with LGBTQ microaggression on campus. The PRISMA model has been used to systematically identify, screen, and review fifty-nine articles published between 2010 and 2022. The results identified multiple forms of microaggression, i.e. environmental (secondhand witnessing of homophobia and heterosexism on campus), and interpersonal (through peer/faculty/staff interaction). LGBTQ microaggression negatively impacts the academic outcomes (absenteeism, attrition, and productivity) and mental health of the students. Intersectionality accelerates the vulnerability to experiencing microaggression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available