4.7 Article

Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Clinical Trajectories of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis with Systolic Dysfunction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237250

Keywords

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; reverse remodeling; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) due to ATTR-CM, more than one-third of patients showed improvement in LVEF over time, while those with a decrease in LVEF had worse long-term outcomes.
Background: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) is classically thought of as a progressive disease with preserved systolic function. The longitudinal clinical trajectories of ATTR-CM with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain unclear. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with ATTR-CM who underwent two or more echocardiograms with baseline LVEF < 50%. Patients were stratified according to the presence of >= 5% change in LVEF. A Cox proportional hazard model examined hazard of a composite outcome of death, transplant, or LVAD insertion over the two years following diagnosis. Results: In our study cohort of 179 patients, 62 patients (34.6%) experienced an increase in LVEF while 33 (18.4%) experienced a decrease in LVEF. After adjusting for covariates, patients with a decrease in EF experienced increased hazard of death (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.05-4.40, p = 0.038) compared to those with stable or an increase in LVEF. Changes in LVEF corresponded with significant differences in NT proBNP trajectories, but initial biomarker levels or clinical staging were not predictive of LVEF trajectory. Conclusions: in ATTR-CM patients with impaired LVEF, over a third demonstrated improved LVEF over time, while those with a decrease in LVEF had worse long-term outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available