4.7 Article

Platelet Reduction after Aortic Bioprosthesis Implantation: Results from the PORTRAIT Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237414

Keywords

platelet; biological prosthesis; aortic valve replacement; thrombocytopenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the occurrence and clinical impact of platelet count reduction in patients receiving different types of aortic bioprosthesis valve implantation. The results showed that platelet count at discharge was lower than the baseline values in all groups. Patients with rapid deployment and stentless bioprostheses experienced a greater reduction in platelet count, which was associated with the size of the bioprosthesis. Platelet count variation was not directly proportional to the size of the stented bioprosthesis and was not affected by cardiopulmonary bypass or cross-clamp times. Platelet count reduction was associated with ischemic strokes.
Background: Platelet count reduction (PR) is a common but unclear phenomenon that occurs after aortic bioprosthesis valve implantation (bio-AVR). This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and clinical impact of PR in patients receiving stented, rapid deployment (RDV), or stentless bioprostheses. Methods: 1233 adult bio-AVR patients were enrolled. Platelet count variation, early post-operative adverse events, and in-hospital mortality were analysed. Results: 944 patients received a stented valve, an RDV was implanted in 218 patients, and 71 patients had a stentless bioprosthesis. In all groups, the platelet count at discharge was lower than the baseline values (p < 0.001). The percentage of PR was 27% in the stented group, 56% in the RDV group, and 55% in the stentless group. A higher platelet reduction, reaching the minimum platelet value, was observed in the RDV (mean: -30.84, standard error (SE): 5.91, p < 0.001) and stentless (mean: 22.54, SE: 9.10, p = 0.03) groups compared to the stented group. A greater PR occurred as the size of the bioprosthesis increased in RDV (p = 0.01), while platelet count variation was not directly proportional to the stented bioprosthesis size (p < 0.001). PR was not affected by cardiopulmonary bypass (mean: -0.00, SE: 0.001, p = 0.635) or cross-clamp (mean: -0.00, SE: 0.002, p = 0.051) times in any of the groups. RDV subjects experienced more in-hospital adverse events. PR was found to be associated with ischemic strokes in the overall population. Conclusions: Bio-AVR is associated with significant but transient PR. RDV patients more likely experience significant PR and related adverse clinical events. PR is associated with ischemic strokes, regardless of the bioprosthesis type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available