4.7 Article

A pharmacokinetic study on red ginseng with furosemide in equine

Journal

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1319998

Keywords

red ginseng; furosemide; herb-drug interaction; equine; pharmacokinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the pharmacokinetic interaction between red ginseng and furosemide in horse plasma. The results show that the consumption of red ginseng leads to increased concentration of furosemide and decreased clearance and distribution volume. These findings indicate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between red ginseng and furosemide.
Red ginseng (RG) is a popular ingredient in traditional Korean medicine that has various health benefits. It is commonly taken orally as a dietary supplement; however, its potential interactions with concomitantly administered drugs are unclear. In this study, we examined the pharmacokinetic interaction between furosemide and RG in equine plasma. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry analysis was performed to evaluate ginsenosides in the plasma of horses after feeding them RG and furosemide and validate the results. A single bolus of furosemide (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously to female horses that had consumed RG (600 mg/kg/day) every morning for 3 weeks (experimental group), and blood samples were collected from 0 to 24 h, analyzed, and compared with those from female horses that did not consume RG (control group). Four (20s)-protopanaxadiol ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) were detected in the plasma. Rb1 and Rc individually showed a high concentration distribution in the plasma. The C-max, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) of furosemide was significantly increased in the experimental group (p < 0.05), while the CL, V-z, and V-ss was decreased (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). These changes indicate the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between furosemide and RG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available