4.2 Article

Age and education effects in Singapore's demographic dividend 1970-2020

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF AGEING
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2023.100482

Keywords

Singapore; demographic dividend; Das Gupta decomposition; age effect; education effect; National Transfer Accounts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the economic growth of Singapore from 1970 to 2020 and the contribution of age and education to the demographic dividend. The findings show that the education effect was greater than the age effect throughout the period, particularly in terms of labor income. Understanding these effects is crucial for future policy-making in Singapore as it continues to face rapid aging.
Singapore had experienced rapid GDP growth from the period of 1970-2020. This work is adds to the overall contribution in studies understanding the contribution of age and education effects in the demographic dividend for countries, in this case - for a small, rapidly-developing country in Asia that had achieved high-income status. Following Renteria et. al. (2016), we use the Das Gupta decomposition technique to decompose Singapore's demographic dividend to the respective age effect and education effect. We do this, having derived labour in-come and consumption profiles by age and education attainment, using National Transfer Account (NTA) methodology. We find that for Singapore the education effect was larger than the age effect for the entire period, driven by the education effect on labour income. These findings are comparable to Renteria et. al. (2016) for Mexico and Spain where the education effect were also larger than the age effect. Understanding the contri-butions of age and education effects on the economic support ratio will have policy implications as Singapore continues to age rapidly. This work also adds to the perspective on the importance of building up human capital in sustaining the demographic dividend.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available