3.8 Article

Silicone oil insulation effects on flash electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in patients with retinal detachment

Journal

JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.100502

Keywords

Silicone oil; Retina surgery; Visual evoked; Electroretinogram; Toxicity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the hypothesis that silicone oil causes insulation effects on the retina by affecting its response to light. Electrophysiological responses to a flash stimulus were recorded in patients who underwent surgery for retinal detachment, before and after silicone oil removal. The study found statistically significant differences in the amplitudes of the ERG responses and their corresponding ratios, indicating that silicone oil reduces the flash ERG responses.
Background: Silicone oil is used as endotamponade following vitreoretinal surgery to maintain the retina reattached when indicated. This study investigates the hypothesis that silicone oil causes insulation effects on the retina by affecting its response to light.Methods: Electrophysiological responses to a flash stimulus were recorded using full-field electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP). Recordings were performed in 9 patients who underwent surgery for retinal detachment, before (1-2 days) and after (2-3 weeks) silicone oil removal (SOR) in both the study and the control eye. Flash ERG and VEP recordings were performed according to the ISCEV standard protocol.Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the study eye in the amplitudes of the ERG responses and their corresponding ratios, i.e. the amplitude after SOR over the amplitude before SOR, in all conditions tested. No differences were observed in the control eye. The mean ratio of photopic ERG response was 3.4 +/- 2.4 for the study and 1.0 +/- 0.3 for the control eye (p<0.001). The mean ratio of ERG flicker response was 3.1 +/- 2.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.3, respectively (p = 0.003). Scotopic flash ERG ratio was 5.0 +/- 4.4 for the study and 1.3 +/- 0.6 for the control eye (p = 0.012). No differences were observed for the amplitude and latency of flash VEP response after SOR.Conclusions: Silicone oil causes a reduction in flash ERG responses; no effect was found on flash VEP responses. ERGs in eyes filled with silicone oil should not be considered representative of retinal functionality, in contrast to VEPs, which are not affected by silicone oil presence.(c) 2023 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available