4.7 Review

The Management of Chronic Pain: Re-Centring Person-Centred Care

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12226957

Keywords

mental defeat; sleep; digital health; chronic pain management; person-centred care; individual formulations; self; personalised pain management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the importance of a person-centred approach in chronic pain treatment, emphasizing the need to consider the broader impact on individuals' lives and individual differences. It explores innovative approaches to optimize effectiveness and provide person-centred care.
The drive for a more person-centred approach in the broader field of clinical medicine is also gaining traction in chronic pain treatment. Despite current advances, a further departure from 'business as usual' is required to ensure that the care offered or received is not only effective but also considers personal values, goals, abilities, and day-to-day realities. Existing work typically focuses on explaining pain symptoms and the development of standardised interventions, at the risk of overlooking the broader consequences of pain in individuals' lives and individual differences in pain responses. This review underscores the importance of considering additional factors, such as the influence of chronic pain on an individual's sense of self. It explores innovative approaches to chronic pain management that have the potential to optimise effectiveness and offer person-centred care. Furthermore, it delves into research applying hybrid and individual formulations, along with self-monitoring technologies, to enhance pain assessment and the tailoring of management strategies. In conclusion, this review advocates for chronic pain management approaches that align with an individual's priorities and realities while fostering their active involvement in self-monitoring and self-management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available