4.1 Review

Patients' perception of orthodontic retainers: a systematic review

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad068

Keywords

orthodontics; orthodontic retainers; quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review evaluated patients' perceptions of orthodontic retainers, finding initial discomfort and functional limitations but improvements over time. Different esthetic, functional, and ease-of-use advantages were reported for removable and fixed retainers. The evidence suggests a preference for thermoplastic over Hawley-type retainers, despite some functional difficulties.
Background Orthodontic retainers are widely used to prevent relapses after orthodontic treatment; however, evidence about patients' perceptions of retainers is lacking.Objective To assess patients' perception of orthodontic retainers.Search Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, LIVIVO, Cochrane Library, and gray literature (Google Scholar) were searched without date or language restrictions. A manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was also performed.Selection criteria Studies comparing patients' perceptions of wearing orthodontic retainers were included.Data collection and analysis According to the study design, the risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed using RoB 2.0 or ROBINS-I. The level of evidence was assessed through the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool.Results Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. After the RoB assessment, 12 randomized controlled trials presented a high RoB, and 4 non-randomized controlled trials presented a moderate RoB. The certainty of evidence was classified as very low for the four assessed outcomes. The studies generally reported an initial temporary negative impact of orthodontic retainers. Different esthetic, functional, and ease-of-use advantages are reported using removable and fixed retainers. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to the considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies.Conclusion The current evidence, although very limited, suggests that orthodontic retainers have an initial negative impact related to discomfort and functional limitations, but they seem to regress over time. There is a preference for thermoplastic over Hawley-type retainers. However, thermoplastic retainers cause different functional difficulties, and bonded retainers present the advantage of affecting speech function less than orthodontic removable retainers, although they can facilitate oral hygiene problems.Registration PROSPERO (CRD42022306665).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available