3.8 Article

Why Command Responsibility May (not) Be a Solution to Address Responsibility Gaps in LAWS

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Law

A Weapon is No Subordinate Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Scope of Superior Responsibility

Alessandra Spadaro

Summary: The doctrine of superior responsibility is proposed as a solution to the responsibility gap created by the use of autonomous weapon systems that result in violations of international humanitarian law. However, there are challenges to its applicability in these circumstances, as it assumes a hierarchical relationship and requires the commission of an underlying crime by a punishable subordinate. Despite this, the doctrine remains valuable in guiding the discussion on the level of human control over autonomous weapon systems.

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE (2023)

Article Ethics

A Comparative Analysis of the Definitions of Autonomous Weapons Systems

Mariarosaria Taddeo et al.

Summary: This report focuses on the definition of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) and provides a comparative analysis of official definitions provided by States and international organisations. The analysis reveals that these definitions emphasize different aspects of AWS, resulting in different approaches to addressing ethical and legal issues. The study identifies key aspects of AWS and offers a value-neutral definition to address the relevant ethical and legal problems.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2022)

Article Ethics

Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem?

Peter Koenigs

Summary: There has been tremendous progress in artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, but the difficulty of allocating responsibility for the actions of autonomous systems has been a concern. Critics have raised the issue of responsibility gaps, where no one seems to be accountable for the highly autonomous behavior of these systems. In this article, the author proposes a more optimistic view on artificial intelligence, challenging the pessimistic view on responsibility gaps.

ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (2022)

Article Ethics

Who Is Responsible for Killer Robots? Autonomous Weapons, Group Agency, and the Military-Industrial Complex

Isaac Taylor

Summary: The article discusses the moral concerns and responsibility issues surrounding lethal autonomous weapons systems, and proposes a solution of assigning responsibilities to group agents to fill the responsibility gap.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY (2021)

Article Philosophy

Responsibility for Killer Robots

Johannes Himmelreich

ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE (2019)

Article Ethics

Just research into killer robots

Patrick Taylor Smith

ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (2019)

Article Ethics

No Such Thing as Killer Robots

Michael Robillard

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY (2018)

Article Robotics

Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account

Filippo Santoni de Sio et al.

FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI (2018)

Article Philosophy

JUST WAR AND ROBOTS' KILLINGS

Thomas W. Simpson et al.

PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY (2016)