4.6 Article

Community-Enhanced Contrastive Learning for Graph Collaborative Filtering

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12234831

Keywords

graph neural network; contrastive learning; deep learning; recommender system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graph collaborative filtering is an efficient method for finding hidden user interests in recommender systems. However, data sparsity poses a challenge for recommender systems. To address this, researchers have proposed a novel method called CECL, which combines contrastive learning and community detection to utilize latent information in the data, resulting in improved performance compared to existing methods.
Graph collaborative filtering can efficiently find the hidden interests of users for recommender systems in recent years. This method can learn complex interactions between nodes in the graph, identify user preferences, and provide satisfactory recommendations. However, recommender systems face the challenge of data sparsity. To address this, recent studies have utilized contrastive learning to make use of unlabeled data structures. However, the existing positive and negative example sampling methods are not reasonable. Random-based or data augmentation-based sampling cannot make use of useful latent information. Clustering-based sampling methods ignore the semantics of node features and the relationship between global and local information. To utilize the latent structures in the data, we introduce a novel Community-Enhanced Contrastive Learning method to help the recommendation main task called CECL which uses a community detection algorithm to sample examples with semantic and global information, using both known and hidden community connections in the bipartite interaction graph. Extensive experiments are conducted on two well-known datasets, the results of which show a 12% and 8% performance improvement compared to that of the existing baseline methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available