Journal
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106526
Keywords
Caregiver ACEs; Preschool externalizing problems; Caregiver resilience; Promotive factors
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined the impact of caregiver factors on preschool externalizing problems (PEP) and found that positive caregiver childhood experiences were associated with a decrease in PEP. However, this association became non-significant when considering caregiver adverse childhood experiences. Therefore, assessing caregiver adverse childhood experiences is crucial when working with caregivers seeking help for child behavior problems.
Background: Preschool children with externalizing problems are at risk for short-and long-term difficulties and preschool externalizing problems (PEP) are influenced by several caregiver factors. One such factor is caregiver adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Researchers have investigated how caregiver ACEs are related to PEP by identifying risk factors to account for this association. However, research on caregiver factors associated with fewer PEP is limited. Particularly, factors that contribute to caregiver resilience may be adaptive caregiver characteristics that negatively relate to PEP, even when adjusting for caregiver ACEs.Objective: The present study sought to address a gap in the literature by examining the impact of different types of factors that contribute to caregiver resilience (e.g., caregiver social-ecological factors or caregiver positive childhood experiences) as promotive factors of lower PEP. Participants and setting: Participants included 125 caregiver-child dyads recruited from the community.Method: Participating caregivers completed measures of their own and their child's demographic information, caregiver ACEs, caregiver social-ecological factors, caregiver positive childhood experiences, and PEP.Results: Overall, positive caregiver childhood experiences (r =-0.25, p < .01), and not caregiver social-ecological factors (r =-0.13, p = .15), demonstrated a significant negative association with PEP. However, this relation became statistically non-significant when adjusting for caregiver ACEs (beta =-0.12, p = .20).Conclusions: Given the association between caregiver ACEs and PEP, this study highlights the importance of assessing a caregiver's ACEs, specifically when working with caregivers seeking parent training for disruptive child behaviors. There should be a continued focus on ecological and family strengths and differential impacts as they relate to PEP.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available