4.6 Article

Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency

Journal

PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation
  2. Cancer Research UK
  3. Economic and Social Research Council
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/K023187/1]
  5. National Institute for Health Research
  6. Wellcome Trust under UK Clinical Research Collaboration
  7. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/6, MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MR/K023187/1, MC_UU_12015/6] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Public health interventions can be described according to where they lie on two continuums: the population and high-risk approaches anchor one continuum, while the other continuum captures the personal resources (or agency) individuals have to use to benefit from interventions. Population interventions that require individuals to use a high level of agency to benefit tend to be favoured by governments around the world. Population interventions that require individuals to use a low level of agency to benefit are likely to be most effective and most equitable. More effort is required to develop, evaluate, and implement population interventions that require low levels of agency for individuals to benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available