4.2 Article

Frequency effects in the auditory grammatical decision task

Journal

LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2290096

Keywords

Auditory grammatical decision; phrase-frequency; word-frequency; cloze probability; emergentist theories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of phrase-frequency and frequency of content words on grammatical decision. The results show that phrase-frequency has a significant effect on grammatical judgment while controlling for syntactic structure and word-frequency. In contrast, word-frequency does not have a significant effect on grammatical judgment when controlling for phrase-frequency and syntactic structure. Furthermore, a re-analysis using a subset of phrases matched for cloze probability confirms the significant effect of phrase-frequency, while the effect of word-frequency remains non-significant.
We investigated effects of phrase-frequency and the frequency of content words in two auditory grammatical decision experiments testing grammatically correct 4-word phrases intermixed with ungrammatical 4-word sequences. A significant phrase-frequency effect was found in Experiment 1 while controlling for syntactic structure (the sequence of parts-of-speech) and word-frequency. No effect of word-frequency was found in Experiment 2 when controlling for phrase-frequency and syntactic structure. A third experiment measured the cloze probability of the final words of the grammatically correct phrases tested in Experiments 1 and 2. Although entering cloze probability as a covariate rendered the effect of phrase-frequency non-significant, a re-analysis of a subset of phrases matched for cloze probability revealed a significant effect of phrase-frequency, while the effect of word-frequency remained non-significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available