4.7 Article

Asymmetric Nonfused Ring Electron Acceptor Based on Benzotriazole Moiety for Efficient Organic Solar Cells

Journal

SOLAR RRL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202300891

Keywords

asymmetric electron acceptors; benzotriazole moieties; efficiencies; nonfused ring electron acceptors; organic solar cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, three nonfused ring electron acceptors (NFREAs) with different terminal groups were designed and synthesized. The influence of terminal groups on the properties of NFREAs was investigated, and it was found that asymmetric NFREAs showed higher power conversion efficiency in organic solar cells compared to symmetric NFREAs.
Nonfused ring electron acceptors (NFREAs) have received much attention due to their distinguished advantages such as simple chemical structure, facile synthesis, and low cost. Herein, three NFREAs with asymmetric and symmetric terminal groups, named CY101, CY102, and CY103, respectively, are designed and synthesized. The effect of terminal groups on the photophysical, electrochemical, and charge transport properties of the NFREAs is further investigated, providing insight to the relationships between the molecular structures and properties of NFREAs. It is found that the asymmetric NFREA CY102-based organic solar cells (OSCs) can yield a power conversion efficiency of 11.30%, which is higher than those of the symmetric CY101-based OSCs (10.20%) and CY103-based OSCs (8.99%). These results indicate that the asymmetric design strategy can be introduced into NFREAs to engage the high-performance OSCs. A nonfused ring electron acceptor based on benzotriazole moiety with asymmetric terminal groups is first synthesized to reveal the effect of asymmetric terminal groups on optoelectronic property, molecular packing behaviors, charge transports, film morphology, as well as photovoltaic performance.image (c) 2023 WILEY-VCH GmbH

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available