4.3 Article

Digital sustainability assurance governing global value chains: The case of aquaculture

Journal

REGULATION & GOVERNANCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rego.12571

Keywords

aquaculture; digitalization; global value chains; sustainability assurance; value chain governance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of digital technologies in aquaculture is increasingly addressing sustainability risks, challenging existing governance models of global value chains. Digital sustainability assurance relies on new actors and informational processes, complicating sustainability claims and requiring new capabilities from value chain actors. Digital sustainability assurance represents a new form of value chain coordination, led by extra-transactional digital actors, who gain control over digital data flows and have the potential to steer towards sustainability.
Sustainability risks in aquaculture are increasingly addressed through forms of assurance that rely on the use of digital technologies. By bringing in new actors and informational processes, these forms of digital sustainability assurance challenge existing notions of how global value chains are governed. Based on in-depth interviews with experts, we find that the growing use of digital technologies to mediate assurance is shaped by the digital codification of informational processes designed to support sustainability, which in turn increases the complexity of sustainability claims and changes the capabilities needed by value chain actors to comply. Furthermore, we find that digital sustainability assurance represents a new form of value chain coordination by a new set of extra-transactional digital lead actors. As these lead actors become more prominent, their control over digital data flows constitutes a new form of value chain governance with the potential to have greater impact on steering toward sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available