4.2 Article

A qualitative study of reflective practice in the workplace. Speech-language pathologists have their say

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2267193

Keywords

reflective practice; speech-language pathology; workplace practice; qualitative research; thematic analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the experiences and perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) regarding reflective practice (RP). Through analysis of interview data, the study found that SLPs value RP for supporting client focused care, problem-solving, and lifelong learning. They desired protected time for RP at all stages of their careers and believed that relationships with others contribute positively to RP.
PurposeEngaging in reflective practice (RP) and demonstrating reflective abilities is an essential graduate skill for speech-language pathologists (SLPs), yet limited studies have examined the perspectives of practicing SLPs and how and why they engage in RP. This qualitative study aimed to examine SLPs' experiences and perspectives of RP in diverse workplaces.MethodIndividual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 SLPs working in health, education, or private practice sectors. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultThree themes were developed from the data, describing what SLPs use RP for, what SLPs perceive as important in order to engage in RP in the workplace, as well as the barriers they have identified, and how SLPs have observed a change in engaging in RP as they have progressed in their careers.ConclusionSLPs described that RP is valued in the workplace for supporting client focused care, problem-solving, and lifelong learning. SLPs wanted time to be protected for RP at all stages of their career and valued the relationships with others as contributing positively to RP. Perceptions of and engagement in RP changed in relation to SLPs' clinical experience. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available