4.6 Review

Removal of Inorganic Pollutants from Wastewater: Innovative Technologies and Toxicity Assessment

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su152316376

Keywords

inorganic pollutants; detection and quantification; water pollutants; toxicity assessment; environmental pollution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past decade, there has been a sudden increase in the number and types of emerging water contaminants. Inorganic pollutants are more common than organic pollutants, but there is still a need for advancements in detection and remediation techniques. This paper discusses major inorganic pollutants, such as metals and their salts, inorganic fertilizers, sulfides, acids and bases, and ammonia and oxides of nitrogen, and presents updated methods for their quantification and mitigation.
In the past decade, a sudden increase in the number and kind of emerging water contaminants has been observed. The emerging contaminants can be categorized as organic or inorganic. Organic contaminants have been known for years, and techniques for their detection and remediation have been developed. However, inorganic pollutants are much more common. This is because they are detected in very low or negligible concentrations and are equally toxic as organic pollutants at higher concentrations. To boost the research on inorganic pollutant contamination, advancements in detection and quantification techniques are required. The presented paper discusses major inorganic pollutants such as metals and their salts, inorganic fertilizers, sulfides, acids and bases, and ammonia and oxides of nitrogen. In addition, it discusses the inorganic toxicants' toxicity to organisms and the environment, upgraded quantification methods, and advancements in inorganic toxicant mitigation. Moreover, the major bottlenecks in the quantification and removal of inorganic pollutants are discussed at the end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available