Journal
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ede.12464
Keywords
allometry; developmental plasticity; geometric morphometrics; Onthophagus; RNA interference; scaling
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Static allometry is a significant component of morphological variation. This study uses geometric morphometrics to investigate the effect of functional genetic manipulations on horn shape allometry in dung beetles. The findings suggest that some genes closely align with shape allometry, indicating their role in regulating relative trait growth, while other genes are implicated in scaling-independent processes. The study highlights the importance of multivariate approaches in studying allometry and phenotypic plasticity.
Static allometry is a major component of morphological variation. Much of the literature on the development of allometry investigates how functional perturbations of diverse pathways affect the relationship between trait size and body size. Often, this is done with the explicit objective to identify developmental mechanisms that enable the sensing of organ size and the regulation of relative growth. However, changes in relative trait size can also be brought about by a range of other distinctly different developmental processes, such as changes in patterning or tissue folding, yet standard univariate biometric approaches are usually unable to distinguish among alternative explanations. Here, we utilize geometric morphometrics to investigate the degree to which functional genetic manipulations known to affect the size of dung beetle horns also recapitulate the effect of horn shape allometry. We reasoned that the knockdown phenotypes of pathways governing relative growth should closely resemble shape variation induced by natural allometric variation. In contrast, we predicted that if genes primarily affect alternative developmental processes, knockdown effects should align poorly with shape allometry. We find that the knockdown effects of several genes (e.g., doublesex, Foxo) indeed closely aligned with shape allometry, indicating that their corresponding pathways may indeed function primarily in the regulation of relative trait growth. In contrast, other knockdown effects (e.g., Distal-less, dachs) failed to align with allometry, implicating these pathways in potentially scaling-independent processes. Our findings moderate the interpretation of studies focusing on trait length and highlight the usefulness of multivariate approaches to study allometry and phenotypic plasticity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available