4.1 Article

Where is Mi Gente? Codeswitching (Afro)Latinidad in the music classroom

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02557614231215807

Keywords

AfroLatina/o/x; codeswitching; identity; retention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the domain of musical codeswitching (CS) in the context of music education programs, shedding light on historically underrepresented individuals' (HURIs) participation in the field. Findings indicate that CS is perceived as mandatory for accessing dominant U.S. music school culture, but sustained multi-CS scenarios may have negative effects on HURIs.
Musical codeswitching (CS) entails mixing musical ideas and genres. The term CS originated in linguistics, based on language alternations attested in bilinguals. Switches in sociocultural behaviors also now receive scholarly attention as CS. The current multiple case study explores CS domains (music, language, and behavior) in the context of music education programs, where CS remains under-researched. This study also fills a gap by examining historically underrepresented individuals' (HURIs) participation in music education. Here, a CS-based account provides a deeper understanding of the complex sociocultural capital, linguistic resources and lived experiences that HURIs navigate. As part of an interpretive qualitative study design, semi-structured interviews were carried out with a HURI subpopulation (bilingual, [Afro]Latina/o/x faculty, and students) in music education. Findings show participants perceive CS to be mandatory for accessing dominant U.S. music school culture. Additional findings reveal HURIs must master CS in musical, linguistic, and behavioral domains to avoid negative outcomes, yet sustained multi-CS scenarios may have psychological and even physical costs. Insights from CS are thus critical for pinpointing institutional barriers to greater HURI involvement in music education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available