4.3 Article

Is there really a healthy context paradox for victims of bullying? A longitudinal test of bidirectional within-and between-person associations between victimization and psychological problems

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579423001384

Keywords

healthy context paradox; victimization; depressive symptoms; anxiety; self-esteem

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the moderating effect of classroom-level victimization on the bidirectional relationship between victimization and psychological adjustment. The findings revealed that victims in classrooms with lower victimization not only experienced worse psychological adjustment over time compared to others, but also had higher maladjustment than before.
The finding that victims' psychological problems tend to be exacerbated in lower-victimization classrooms has been referred to as the healthy context paradox. The current study has put the healthy context paradox to a strict test by examining whether classroom-level victimization moderates bidirectional within- and between-person associations between victimization and psychological adjustment. Across one school year, 3,470 Finnish 4th to 9th graders (Mage = 13.16, 46.1% boys) reported their victimization, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and self-esteem. Three types of multilevel models (cross-lagged panel, latent change score, and random-intercept cross-lagged panel) were estimated for each indicator of psychological adjustment. Findings indicated that the healthy context paradox emerges because classroom-level victimization moderates the prospective effect of victimization on psychological problems, rather than the effect of psychological problems on victimization. In classrooms with lower victimization, victims not only experience worse psychological maladjustment over time compared to others (between-person changes), but also higher maladjustment than before (absolute within-person changes).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available