4.7 Article

Infants' looking preferences for social versus non-social objects reflect genetic variation

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01764-w

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the individual differences in infants' early preference for faces versus non-facial objects, and finds that these differences are influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Genetic and unique environmental effects have a significant impact on infants' attention to faces, while shared environment does not. Additionally, infants' face preference is positively associated with later verbal competence.
To what extent do individual differences in infants' early preference for faces versus non-facial objects reflect genetic and environmental factors? Here in a sample of 536 5-month-old same-sex twins, we assessed attention to faces using eye tracking in two ways: initial orienting to faces at the start of the trial (thought to reflect subcortical processing) and sustained face preference throughout the trial (thought to reflect emerging attention control). Twin model fitting suggested an influence of genetic and unique environmental effects, but there was no evidence for an effect of shared environment. The heritability of face orienting and preference were 0.19 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.33) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.57), respectively. Face preference was associated positively with later parent-reported verbal competence (beta = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.25, P = 0.014, R-2 = 0.018, N = 420). This study suggests that individual differences in young infants' selection of perceptual input-social versus non-social-are heritable, providing a developmental perspective on gene-environment interplay occurring at the level of eye movements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available