4.7 Article

Multi-stakeholder perspective to generate evidence and strategies for sustainable management of ropes from the fishing sector of Norway

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115798

Keywords

Fishing gear; ALDFG; Circular economy; Ropes; Gear marking; Sustainable fisheries; Plastic recycling; Marine pollution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine plastic pollution is becoming a major issue that affects both marine and terrestrial life. A study conducted in Norway, a fishing-dominant region, found that approximately 383 tons of fishing ropes are lost annually in Norwegian waters, endangering fish species. The study highlights the need for circular economy practices and efficient recycling technologies to address the issue.
Marine plastic pollution is a growing stressor affecting both marine and terrestrial life. Plastic polymers are widespread in oceans, including sparsely populated Nordic countries. Norway, a fishing-dominant region, faces substantial plastic pollution from fishing ropes, which often end up incinerated, landfilled, or lost in the ocean, contributing to the ghost fishing problem. This research employs a static material flow analysis (MFA) to assess plastic mass flows and the recyclability of 15 rope types used in Norway's commercial fishing sector. Findings reveal that approximately 383 tons of ropes are lost annually in Norwegian waters, endangering fish species. Furthermore, only one-third of the rope types can be efficiently recycled using available recycling technologies, highlighting the need for circularity. The MFA and inventory-based ranking approach shows significant potential as a holistic decision support tool for industry and policymakers in exercising sustainable and circular management for ropes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available