4.8 Article

Inoculating functional bacteria improved the humification process by regulating microbial networks and key genera in straw composting by adding different nitrogen sources

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 393, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130022

Keywords

Agricultural waste composting; Bioaugmentation; Humus; Lignocellulose degradation; Nitrogen sources addition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of functional inoculant and different nitrogen sources on straw composting. The results showed that inoculation improved the heating process and increased the formation of humus. Bioinformatics analysis revealed different bacterial genera in relation to different nitrogen sources, and network analysis showed enhanced microbial synergistic effect with inoculation and nitrogen addition.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of functional inoculant and different nitrogen sources on the relationship among lignocellulose, precursors, and humus as well as their interactions with bacterial genera in straw composting. Results showed that inoculation improved the heating process and retained more nitrate compared to control. Inoculation increased the degradation of lignocellulosic components by 26.9%-81.6% and the formation of humus by 15.7%-23.0%. Bioinformatics analysis showed that inoculation enriched key genera Chryseolinea in complex nitrogen source (pig manure) compost and Pusillimas, Luteimonas, and Flavobacteria in single nitrogen source (urea) compost, which were related to humus formation. Network analysis found that inoculation and urea addition improved the microbial synergistic effect and inoculation combined with pig manure had more complex modularity and interactions. Combining the functional bacterial inoculant with urea helped to enhance the degradation of lignocellulose and humification process during straw composting especially with single nitrogen source.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available