4.8 Article

Wildland Fires Worsened Population Exposure to PM2.5 Pollution in the Contiguous United States

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 48, Pages 19990-19998

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05143

Keywords

smoke PM2.5; wildfire; air pollution; remote sensing; machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As wildland fires become more frequent and intense, the impact of fire smoke on air quality has worsened significantly, especially on the West Coast and in the Southeastern U.S. Over the past decade, fire smoke contributed over 25% of daily PM2.5 concentrations at most monitoring sites in the U.S., with residents further away from monitoring sites experiencing a higher smoke impact. Furthermore, excluding the contribution of fire smoke would result in a higher compliance rate with the national ambient air quality standard.
As wildland fires become more frequent and intense, fire smoke has significantly worsened the ambient air quality, posing greater health risks. To better understand the impact of wildfire smoke on air quality, we developed a modeling system to estimate daily PM2.5 concentrations attributed to both fire smoke and nonsmoke sources across the contiguous U.S. We found that wildfire smoke has the most significant impact on air quality in the West Coast, followed by the Southeastern U.S. Between 2007 and 2018, fire smoke contributed over 25% of daily PM2.5 concentrations at similar to 40% of all regulatory air monitors in the EPA's air quality system (AQS) for more than one month per year. People residing outside the vicinity of an EPA AQS monitor (defined by a 5 km radius) were subject to 36% more smoke impact days compared with those residing nearby. Lowering the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for annual mean PM2.5 concentrations to between 9 and 10 mu g/m3 would result in approximately 35-49% of the AQS monitors falling in nonattainment areas, taking into account the impact of fire smoke. If fire smoke contribution is excluded, this percentage would be reduced by 6 and 9%, demonstrating the significant negative impact of wildland fires on air quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available