3.8 Review

Comparison of paediatric basic life support guidelines endorsed by member councils of Resuscitation Council of Asia

Journal

RESUSCITATION PLUS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100506

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Life support care; Pediatrics; Practice guidelines as topic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed published pediatric resuscitation algorithms in Asia, finding both similarities and differences in pediatric life support guidelines, which highlight important knowledge gaps in pediatric resuscitation science.
Background: Paediatric cardiac arrest outcomes, especially for infants, remain poor. Due to different training, resource differences, and historical reasons, paediatric cardiac arrest algorithms for various Asia countries vary. While there has been a common basic life support algorithm for adults by the Resuscitation Council of Asia (RCA), there is no common RCA algorithm for paediatric life support. We aimed to review published paediatric life support guidelines from different Asian resuscitation councils.Methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar search were performed for published paediatric basic and advanced life support guidelines from January 2015 to June 2023. Paediatric representatives from the Resuscitation Council of Asia were sought and contacted to provide input from September 2022 till June 2023.Results: While most of the components of published paediatric life support algorithms of Asian countries are similar, there are notable variations in terms of age criteria for recommended use of adult basic life support algorithms in the paediatric population less than 18 years old, recommended paediatric chest compression depth targets, ventilation rates post-advanced airway intra-arrest, and first defibrillation dose for shockable rhythms in paediatric cardiac arrest.Conclusion: This was an overview and mapping of published Asian paediatric resuscitation algorithms. It highlights similarities across paediatric life support guidelines in Asian countries. There were some differences in components of paediatric life support which highlight important knowledge gaps in paediatric resuscitation science. The minor differences in the paediatric life support guidelines endorsed by the member councils may pro -vide a framework for prioritising resuscitation research and highlight knowledge gaps in paediatric resuscitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available