4.7 Article

Tetrathiophene-based fully non-fused ring electron acceptors via asymmetric side chain engineering

Journal

DYES AND PIGMENTS
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2023.111808

Keywords

Fully non-fused electron acceptors; Asymmetric side-chain engineering; Molecular conformations; Tetrathiophene; Molecular stacking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Side-chain engineering is an effective strategy for optimizing non-fullerene acceptors. In this study, three fully non-fused electron acceptors were synthesized using different side chain combinations. The results demonstrate the importance of asymmetric side-chain engineering in improving efficiency.
Side-chain engineering has been considered as one of the most promising strategies to optimize non-fullerene acceptors. In this work, we use side-chain engineering to synthesize three fully non-fused electron acceptors (FNEAs) i.e. two symmetric acceptors (4T-BE and 4T-TO) and one asymmetric acceptor (4T-BOE) by different side chain combination onto the tetrathiophene unit, which could effectively tune the molecular conformations, electronic properties, charge carrier transport, film morphology, and photovoltaic properties. From 4T-BE to 4TBOE and 4T-TO, the molecules present more red-shifted absorption, smaller optical bandgaps, initially rising and then declining LUMO energy levels and stronger intermolecular stacking. When blended with polymer donor PBDB-T, asymmetric 4T-BOE with alkoxy and ester side chains demonstrate a champion PCE of 9.57% with a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 16.28 mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.87 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 67.50%, which was higher than that of the devices based on PBDB-T:4T-BE and PBDB-T:4T-TO. These results demonstrate that asymmetric side-chain engineering is an especially crucial and effective approach for the design of highly efficient FNEAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available