4.7 Article

Creating high-affinity binding sites for efficient CO2 and iodine vapor uptake through direct synthesis of novel triazine-based covalent organic polymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 5629-5638

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.309

Keywords

High-affinity binding sites; Triazine-based covalent organic polymers; CO2 capture; Iodine uptake

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of triazine-based covalent organic polymers with high adsorption performance and stability were successfully constructed through a catalyst-free polycondensation approach. These polymers offer an alternative route for capturing carbon dioxide and iodine.
Two types of triazine-based covalent organic polymers were successfully constructed through a one-pot and catalyst-free polycondensation approach. More specifically, two kinds of aromatic aldehyde containing different hydroxyl content named terephthalaldehyde and 2, 4, 6-trihydroxyisophthalaldehyde were selected and the derived polymers (denoted as POPs-1 and POPs-2) with large Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas (> 360 m(2)/g), high total pore volume (> 0.47 m(3)/g), good stability and different heteroatoms (such as N and O) contents were prepared. Interestingly, POPs-1 featuring high BET surface area and N content (up to 34.83 %) exhibited excellent iodine vapor uptake of 441 wt% at 348 K/1.0 bar, POPs-2 with high O content (up to 25.83 %) showed better CO2 adsorption capacity (91.8 mg/g) at 273 K/1.0 bar and higher isosteric heat of adsorption (up to 85.0 kJ/mol) than that of POPs-1. This value of the isosteric heat is the highest value reported to date for porous organic polymers. This excellent adsorption performance was resulted either from the large BET surface area or high heteroatoms (N and O) contents of the porous adsorbents. The study offer an alternative route to develop high-performance porous adsorbents to capture carbon dioxide and iodine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available