4.6 Review

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Gait Disturbance in Post-Stroke Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23239301

Keywords

physiotherapy; neurorehabilitation; transcranial electrical stimulation; stroke; gait; non-invasive stimulation techniques

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review analyzes the evidence for the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the recovery of gait disturbance in stroke patients. The results show that moderate to low-quality evidence suggests a beneficial effect of tDCS on gait parameters, but the differences are not significant. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend this treatment, and higher-quality studies are needed for stronger conclusions.
Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising technique for brain modulation after a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). This treatment modality has been previously studied in the recovery of patients. The aim of this review is to analyse the evidence for the application of tDCS in the recovery of gait disturbance in stroke patients. Methods: This review was conducted according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. Three different electronic databases were searched for relevant results: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane, from 2015 to January 2022. We included reviews and meta-analyses that only considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation, in combination or not with other physiotherapy treatments, compared to no treatment, usual care, or alternative treatment on gait recovery. Our primary outcomes of interest were walking speed, mobility, and endurance; secondary outcomes included motor function. Results: Thirteen studies with a total of 195 RCTs were included. Data on population, outcome measures, protocols, and outcomes were extracted. The Amstar-2 scale and the GRADE system of certainty of evidence were used. Only one study received high certainty of evidence, 5 received low certainty of evidence, and 7 received critically low certainty of evidence. Moderate to low-quality evidence showed a beneficial effect of tDCS on gait parameters, but not significantly. Conclusions: Although the tDCS produces positive changes in gait recovery in spatio-temporal parameters such as mobility, endurance, strength, and motor function, there is insufficient evidence to recommend this treatment. Higher-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed for stronger conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available