4.6 Article

The pregnancy and oncology outcome of fertility-sparing management for synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary

Journal

JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01316-w

Keywords

Fertility-sparing treatment; Synchronous endometrial and ovarian neoplasm; Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOC); Endometrial cancer (EC); Ovarian cancer (OC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the efficacy of fertility-preserving treatment for young women with synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary. The results showed that fertility-sparing treatment is feasible, but strict screening and monitoring are necessary.
PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of fertility-preserving treatment for young women with synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed eight patients with concurrent primary grade 1 presumed stage IA endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and primary stage I ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing treatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between April 2016 and December 2022.ResultsSynchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOC) accounted for 50% of these eight patients. The median age of patients was 30.5 years (range, 28-34 years). None of them received chemotherapy. The median treatment time was 4 months (range, 3-8 months). 87.5% (7/8) cases achieved complete response (CR), and the median time to CR was 3.8 months (range, 1.5-7.7 months). Among patients who got CR, none of them showed any signs of recurrence. Pregnancies and successful deliveries were achieved in 4 of 5 patients. Till September 2023, the median follow-up period was 50.5 months (range:15.2-85.2 months).ConclusionFertility-sparing treatment is feasible for highly selected patients with synchronous neoplasm of the endometrium and ovary, but strict screening and monitoring are mandatory. Though the results of our limited cases are encouraging, long follow-up and more clinical data are required. Enrolled patients must be fully informed of the risks during conservative treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available