4.6 Article

Posterior Parietal Cortex Drives Inferotemporal Activations During Three-Dimensional Object Vision

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002445

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. interuniversity attraction poles IUAP [VII/11]
  2. Fonds Wetenschappelijk onderzoek FWO [G.0713.09, G.0622.08, G.0831.11]
  3. Fonds Wetenschappelijk onderzoek FWO
  4. Odysseus [G.0007.12]
  5. European Research Council ERC [Stg-260607]
  6. National Science Foundation NSF [BCS-0745436]
  7. [PFV/10/008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primate visual system consists of a ventral stream, specialized for object recognition, and a dorsal visual stream, which is crucial for spatial vision and actions. However, little is known about the interactions and information flow between these two streams. We investigated these interactions within the network processing three-dimensional (3D) object information, comprising both the dorsal and ventral stream. Reversible inactivation of the macaque caudal intraparietal area (CIP) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reduced fMRI activations in posterior parietal cortex in the dorsal stream and, surprisingly, also in the inferotemporal cortex (ITC) in the ventral visual stream. Moreover, CIP inactivation caused a perceptual deficit in a depth-structure categorization task. CIP-microstimulation during fMRI further suggests that CIP projects via posterior parietal areas to the ITC in the ventral stream. To our knowledge, these results provide the first causal evidence for the flow of visual 3D information from the dorsal stream to the ventral stream, and identify CIP as a key area for depth-structure processing. Thus, combining reversible inactivation and electrical microstimulation during fMRI provides a detailed view of the functional interactions between the two visual processing streams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available