3.8 Article

Our very prison this earth is: the world as prison and other images common to More's Epigrams and later works

Journal

MOREANA
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 178-195

Publisher

EDINBURGH UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3366/more.2023.0150

Keywords

Epigrams; prison; fame; land; rich; Dialogue of Comfort; Treatise on the Passion; Tower Works

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces More's Epigrams of 1518, which are usually associated with his humanist phase. The article pays special attention to the repetition of phrasing and argumentation used in the Epigrams in More's later works. It discusses various examples and highlights the parallels between these epigrams and his later writings, providing insights into More's humanist style. The article also mentions that, like his earlier English poetry, some of More's Latin poems were written to promote virtue.
More's Epigrams of 1518, usually associated with More's humanist phase, contain a number of poems designed as meditations on proper attitudes towards the goods of fortune. Special attention is given to how phrasing and argumentation used in the Epigrams reappears within a number of More's later works, including Last Things, Treatise on the Passion, and A Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation. Both briefer and longer examples are discussed, the latter including More's more elaborate description of the world as prison (Epigram 119) and fame as an insubstantial wind (Epigram 132). Numerous parallels between the arguments of these epigrams and his later works, written for spirituall profytt (The Correspondence of Sir Thomas More, ed. Elizabeth Frances Rogers [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947], 531), are examined, giving us insights into the writings of the humanist More. As much of his earlier English poetry, some of the More's Latin poems were written with an eye towards the happy continuannce and graciouse encreace of vertue (CW 1:51/20-21)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available