4.4 Review

Cellular senescence and frailty: a comprehensive insight into the causal links

Journal

GEROSCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-023-00960-w

Keywords

Aging; Frailty; Cellular senescence; Brain function; Musculoskeletal health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the role of senescent cells in driving inflammation and frailty. The results indicate that the burden of senescent cells related to musculoskeletal and cerebral health has the strongest causal link to frailty. These findings are important for understanding the role of cellular senescence in frailty and developing personalized therapies.
Senescent cells may have a prominent role in driving inflammation and frailty. The impact of cellular senescence on frailty varies depending on the assessment tool used, as it is influenced by the criteria or items predominantly affected by senescent cells and the varying weights assigned to these items across different health domains. To address this challenge, we undertook a thorough review of all available studies involving gain- or loss-of-function experiments as well as interventions targeting senescent cells, focusing our attention on those studies that examined outcomes based on the individual frailty phenotype criteria or specific items used to calculate two humans (35 and 70 items) and one mouse (31 items) frailty indexes. Based on the calculation of a simple evidence score, we found that the burden of senescent cells related to musculoskeletal and cerebral health has the strongest causal link to frailty. We deem that insight into these mechanisms may not only contribute to clarifying the role of cellular senescence in frailty but could additionally provide multiple therapeutic opportunities to help the future development of a desirable personalized therapy in these extremely heterogeneous patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available