4.6 Article

Conservation Research Is Not Happening Where It Is Most Needed

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002413

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT100100413]
  2. Centre of Excellence programs [CE110001014]
  3. Arcus Foundation [G-PGM-1411-1112]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [14-32024P]
  5. Christensen Fund [G-2013-7476407]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. Australian Research Council [FT100100413] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Target 19, set by the Convention on Biological Diversity, seeks to improve the knowledge, science base, and technologies relating to biodiversity. We will fail to achieve this target unless prolific biases in the field of conservation science are addressed. We reveal that comparatively less research is undertaken in the world's most biodiverse countries, the science conducted in these countries is often not led by researchers based in-country, and these scientists are also underrepresented in important international fora. Mitigating these biases requires wide-ranging solutions: reforming open access publishing policies, enhancing science communication strategies, changing author attribution practices, improving representation in international processes, and strengthening infrastructure and human capacity for research in countries where it is most needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available