4.3 Article

Letters to stakeholders: An emerging phenomenon of multi-stakeholder engagement

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12639

Keywords

content analysis; corporate communication; letters to stakeholders; multi-stakeholder engagement; multi-stakeholder orientation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through our study of the top 100 largest multinational companies worldwide, we have discovered that approximately one-third of these companies have started using letters to stakeholders, which adopt a multi-stakeholder orientation. Our findings demonstrate that letters to stakeholders are positively related to firms' willingness to engage with multiple stakeholders and that they welcome stakeholder recognition, support, and dialogue. This positions letters to stakeholders as a promising tool and approach in corporate communication, improving the legitimacy and moral consideration of stakeholders.
We explore a new phenomenon of multi-stakeholder orientation and engagement in corporate communication: letters to stakeholders. By applying content, semantic, and quantitative analyses to standardized corporate communication among the 100 largest multinational companies worldwide, our study reveals that approximately one-third of the examined companies have begun to utilize what could be considered letters to stakeholders. We demonstrate that letters to stakeholders adopt a multi-stakeholder orientation, which describes the ability to speak a language that is widely comprehensible by a diverse audience. Letters to stakeholders are positively related to firm willingness to display multi-stakeholder engagement activities by embracing stakeholder recognition, support, and dialog. Our findings position letters to stakeholders as a promising tool for and approach to corporate communication that improves the legitimacy and moral consideration of stakeholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available