3.8 Article

Creation of social interaction environments with robot for autistic children: analysis of assessment instruments and type of activities

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JET-06-2023-0019

Keywords

Robotics; Bibliometrics; Evaluation tools; Type of activity; Social robotics; Autism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to review the assessment tools and types of activities in the application of robotics to autistic students during the period 1996-2021. The findings show that 16.80% of the studies used automatic measurement systems, 15.96% used user observation and recording techniques, and 37.80% focused on imitation tasks.
PurposeThe aim of the study is to conduct a thematic review of assessment tools and types of activities in the application of robotics to autistic students during the period 1996-2021 using Web of Science and Scopus. The sample consisted of 119 documents.Design/methodology/approachNowadays, emerging technologies have become increasingly prevalent across various fields of knowledge. In this regard, robotics is being increasingly applied in the educational environment. The characteristics of this tool are the ones that best suit the needs of autistic students.FindingsResults reveal that 16.80% of the studies used automatic measurement systems, whilst 15.96% of the studies used user observation and recording techniques. As for the tasks, 37.80% were focussed on imitation tasks. Amongst the practical implications is the need to include tasks that could be developed collaboratively in the regular classroom.Originality/valueWith this research, it is intended to disseminate in the scientific community what are the characteristics that should have the interaction activities between a robot and autistic students. In addition, the type of tool needed to evaluate the improvements in the interaction is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available