4.7 Article

Improved Analysis of GW150914 Using a Fully Spin-Precessing Waveform Model

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) of the United Kingdom
  3. Max-Planck Society (MPS)
  4. State of Niedersachsen/Germany
  5. Australian Research Council
  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  7. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  8. Department of Science and Technology, India
  9. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  10. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  11. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  12. Conselleria d'Economia i Competitivitat and Conselleria d'Educacio
  13. Cultura i Universitats of the Govern de les Illes Balears
  14. National Science Centre of Poland
  15. European Commission
  16. Royal Society
  17. Scottish Funding Council
  18. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  19. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  20. Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  21. National Research Foundation of Korea
  22. Industry Canada
  23. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  24. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada
  25. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  26. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation
  27. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  28. Leverhulme Trust
  29. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  30. Kavli Foundation
  31. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  32. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1028087] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  33. Division Of Physics
  34. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1505373, 1505629, 1307401, 1104371, 1404121, 1608423, 1307489, 1308527] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  35. Division Of Physics
  36. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1404139, 1506360, 1505779, 1207010] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  37. STFC [ST/I006242/1, ST/L000954/1, ST/J000019/1, ST/J000345/1, ST/J00166X/1, ST/N005716/1, ST/M004090/1, ST/N000080/1, ST/H002006/1, ST/K000845/1, ST/N005430/1, 1653089, ST/I006269/1, ST/I000887/1, ST/N000633/1, ST/I006285/1, ST/N005406/1, ST/L000326/1, ST/L000946/1, ST/L000962/1, ST/N000072/1, ST/N000064/1, ST/L003465/1, PP/C505791/1, ST/K005014/1, Gravitational Waves, PPA/G/S/2002/00652, ST/N00003X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  38. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N00003X/1, ST/I006269/1, ST/L000954/1, Gravitational Waves, ST/N000064/1, ST/L000326/1, PPA/G/S/2002/00652, ST/L000946/1, ST/K005014/1, ST/I006285/1 Gravitational Waves, ST/L000962/1 Gravitational Waves, ST/N005430/1, ST/I000887/1, ST/I006285/1, ST/N000072/1, ST/I006242/1, ST/J000345/1 Gravitational Waves, ST/K000845/1, ST/M004090/1, ST/N005406/1, ST/N000080/1, ST/J00166X/1, ST/H002006/1, ST/N005716/1, ST/J000345/1, ST/J000019/1, ST/I000887/1 Gravitational Waves, ST/I006269/1 Gravitational Waves, ST/N000633/1, ST/L000962/1, ST/L003465/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents updated estimates of source parameters for GW150914, a binary black-hole coalescence event detected by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) in 2015 [Abbott et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).]. Abbott et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).] presented parameter estimation of the source using a 13-dimensional, phenomenological precessing-spin model (precessing IMRPhenom) and an 11-dimensional nonprecessing effective-onebody (EOB) model calibrated to numerical-relativity simulations, which forces spin alignment (nonprecessing EOBNR). Here, we present new results that include a 15-dimensional precessing-spin waveform model (precessing EOBNR) developed within the EOB formalism. We find good agreement with the parameters estimated previously [Abbott et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).], and we quote updated component masses of 35(-3)(+5) M-circle dot and 30(-4)(+3) M-circle dot (where errors correspond to 90% symmetric credible intervals). We also present slightly tighter constraints on the dimensionless spin magnitudes of the two black holes, with a primary spin estimate < 0.65 and a secondary spin estimate < 0.75 at 90% probability. Abbott et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).] estimated the systematic parameter-extraction errors due to waveform-model uncertainty by combining the posterior probability densities of precessing IMRPhenom and nonprecessing EOBNR. Here, we find that the two precessing-spin models are in closer agreement, suggesting that these systematic errors are smaller than previously quoted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available