4.6 Article

Auditory Brainstem Response Data Preprocessing Method for the Automatic Classification of Hearing Loss Patients

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13233538

Keywords

deep learning; VGG; ABR; image processing; hearing loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes an image preprocessing process for constructing an efficient image dataset for deep learning models using auditory brainstem response data. The ABR images are standardized and classified using the VGG16 model, and the accuracy of the proposed method is analyzed.
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is the response of the brain stem through the auditory nerve. The ABR test is a method of testing for loss of hearing through electrical signals. Basically, the test is conducted on patients such as the elderly, the disabled, and infants who have difficulty in communication. This test has the advantage of being able to determine the presence or absence of objective hearing loss by brain stem reactions only, without any communication. This paper proposes the image preprocessing process required to construct an efficient graph image data set for deep learning models using auditory brainstem response data. To improve the performance of the deep learning model, we standardized the ABR image data measured on various devices with different forms. In addition, we applied the VGG16 model, a CNN-based deep learning network model developed by a research team at the University of Oxford, using preprocessed ABR data to classify the presence or absence of hearing loss and analyzed the accuracy of the proposed method. This experimental test was performed using 10,000 preprocessed data, and the model was tested with various weights to verify classification learning. Based on the learning results, we believe it is possible to help set the criteria for preprocessing and the learning process in medical graph data, including ABR graph data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available