4.6 Article

Machine learning-based nonlinear regression-adjusted real-time quality control modeling: a multi-center study

Journal

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0964

Keywords

patient-based real-time quality control; machine learning; nonlinear regression; residual

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to develop a machine learning-based patient-based real-time quality control method, which can effectively detect errors in different datasets and has wide application value.
Objectives: Patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC), a laboratory tool for monitoring the performance of the testing process, has gained increasing attention in recent years. It has been questioned for its generalizability among analytes, instruments, laboratories, and hospitals in real-world settings. Our purpose was to build a machine learning, nonlinear regression-adjusted, patient-based real-time quality control (mNL-PBRTQC) with wide application.Methods: Using computer simulation, artificial biases were added to patient population data of 10 measurands. An mNL-PBRTQC was created using eight hospital laboratory databases as a training set and validated by three other hospitals' independent patient datasets. Three different Patient-based models were compared on these datasets, the IFCC PBRTQC model, linear regression-adjusted real-time quality control (L-RARTQC), and the mNL-PBRTQC model.Results: Our study showed that in the three independent test data sets, mNL-PBRTQC outperformed the IFCC PBRTQC and L-RARTQC for all measurands and all biases. Using platelets as an example, it was found that for 20 % bias, both positive and negative, the uncertainty of error detection for mNL-PBRTQC was smallest at the median and maximum values.Conclusions: mNL-PBRTQC is a robust machine learning framework, allowing accurate error detection, especially for analytes that demonstrate instability and for detecting small biases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available