Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A Randomized Trial Comparing Breast Cancer Incidence and Interval Cancers after Tomosynthesis Plus Mammography versus Mammography Alone
Pierpaolo Pattacini et al.
RADIOLOGY (2022)
An image quality review programme in a population-based mammography screening service
Vania Galli et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES (2021)
Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study
Francesca Caumo et al.
RADIOLOGY (2021)
Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers
Gunvor G. Waade et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2021)
Validation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography using ROC analysis
Joana Boita et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2021)
Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation
Ophira Ginsburg et al.
CANCER (2020)
Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis
Gisella Gennaro et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2018)
Improving Performance of Mammographic Breast Positioning in an Academic Radiology Practice
Sunita Pal et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2018)
Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting
Kelly Spuur et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2018)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
Solveig Hofvind et al.
RADIOLOGY (2018)
One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study
Sophia Zackrisson et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2018)
Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening
Katharina Holland et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH (2017)
Mammographic image quality in relation to positioning of the breast: A multicentre international evaluation of the assessment systems currently used, to provide an evidence base for establishing a standardised method of assessment
K. Taylor et al.
RADIOGRAPHY (2017)
MH Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature
Daisy Goodman et al.
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY (2016)
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study
Daniela Bernardi et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2016)
Do Mammographic Technologists Affect Radiologists' Diagnostic Mammography Interpretative Performance?
Louise M. Henderson et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2015)
Mammographic compression - A need for mechanical standardization
Woutjan Branderhorst et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2015)
Comparing the use and interpretation of PGMI scoring to assess the technical quality of screening mammograms in the UK and Norway
M. Boyce et al.
RADIOGRAPHY (2015)
Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
Per Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2014)
A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors
J Tyrer et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)
Share Paper
