4.7 Article

A coaxial nozzle assisted underwater laser welding of 316L stainless steel

Journal

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110176

Keywords

Underwater laser welding (ULW); 316L stainless steel; Welding process dynamics; Porosity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the dynamics of underwater laser welding (ULW) and focuses on the forming characteristics of the welded joints. The study finds that wet ULW fails when the water depth exceeds a certain level. To minimize water interference, a self-designed coaxial nozzle is used. Additionally, the porosity of the welds is sensitive to welding parameters and can be reduced by adjusting the laser power, velocity, and shielding gas flow rate.
As a promising maintenance technique, underwater laser welding (ULW) technology aids in advancing oceanographic engineering. However, water has an attenuating effect on laser making direct ULW challenging, and water intrusion may deteriorate weld formation. This paper qualitatively analyzed the visualization of ULW welding process dynamics under varying water depths, based on image sequences recorded by a high-speed camera, and then focused attention on macro-forming characteristics of ULW joints. The results demonstrate that wet ULW fails when the water depth exceeds 6 mm due to the inability to establish a beam channel, which is required for ULW to proceed. Thus, a self-designed coaxial nozzle was employed to minimize water interference in underwater environment, as demonstrated by numerical simulations. Porosity is sensitive to the welding parameters and can be minimized by lowering laser power, increasing velocity, and choosing a modest shielding gas flow rate. Pore formation is linked to the dynamic behavior of the local gas phase space, which is distinctive to the ULW processing. This work offered a comprehensive understanding of the ULW that was highly feasible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available