4.7 Review

Food Intake and Sleep Disorders in Children and Adolescents with Obesity

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15224736

Keywords

pediatric obesity; sleep disorders; children; adolescents; food intake; diet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous scientific studies have investigated the association between sleep duration and childhood adiposity. Diet patterns and nutrient intake have been found to affect sleep quality and patterns. Sleep disturbances are risk factors for obesity and specific diet patterns can promote better sleep quality.
Over the last few decades, numerous scientific studies have investigated the possible association between sleep duration and adiposity during childhood, since it has been reported that sleep deprivation causes a related increase in caloric intake. Even though the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are still under study and not completely known, the effect of dietetic habits and nutrient intake on sleep quality and patterns has been reported. The aim of this study is to explore the intricate interplay between food intake/diet patterns and pediatric sleep disturbances in children and adolescents with obesity, emphasizing the importance of not underestimating this aspect in the prevention and treatment of this complex disease. Recent evidence supports a high correlation between specific diet patterns and foods with sleep disturbances in children at all ages. Diets rich in fiber, fruit, vegetables, and anti-inflammatory nutrients and low in saturated fats seem to promote better sleep quality. Sleep disturbances are, in turn, risk factors for the development of obesity. Therefore, food strategies should be applied to counteract this harmful process. Unraveling the complex links between dietary habits, sleep patterns, and obesity is essential for developing effective strategies to combat this critical public health issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available