4.7 Article

On smoke layer thickness in short naturally ventilated tunnels with arched roof

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103661

Keywords

Smoke layer thickness; Mass flow rate; Arched ceiling; Air entrainment; Tunnel section size; Heat release rate

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the characteristics and thickness of smoke flow under a curved roof in natural ventilation tunnels. It is found that the smoke mass flow rate is positively correlated with the heat release rate and section radius, while the smoke layer thickness is not significantly affected by the heat release rate and is positively related to the section radius. A practical prediction model for smoke layer thickness and an empirical equation for estimating the total smoke mass flow rate are proposed, and the results are in good agreement with previous simulations and experimental data.
Understanding the characteristics of smoke layer thickness is vital for accurate fire detection, efficient smoke exhaust and safe evacuation in tunnel fire. Nevertheless, smoke flow in tunnels with arched ceiling may show different characteristics from the tunnels with flat roof which is usually studied. Theoretical analysis was conducted on the smoke flow characteristics and thickness under the curved roof of natural ventilation tunnel, and further, numerical simulations were performed to elucidate and verify the mechanism. The results show that smoke mass flow rate is positively correlated with heat release rate(HRR) and section radius. However, the smoke layer thickness is not significantly affected by HRR, and is positively related to the section radius. Based on the mass conservation, a practical prediction model for smoke layer thickness under arched ceiling was derived, and an empirical equation for estimating the total smoke mass flow rate was also proposed. The results presented fairly good agreement with simulations and experimental data from previous works.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available