4.5 Article

Comparisons of the vertical one-handed chest compressions according to the rescuer's handedness

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 18-23

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.009

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Hand; Handedness; Pediatrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The handedness of the rescuer does not significantly affect the chest compression depth (CCD) during vertical one-handed chest compression (OHCC), although using the dominant hand generates greater force.
Objective: The vertical one-handed chest compression (OHCC) technique has demonstrated superior compres-sion power and chest compression depth (CCD) compared to conventional OHCC. This study aimed to determine if a rescuer's handedness influences the CCD during the vertical OHCC.Methods: This prospective randomized crossover simulation trial included 59 medical doctors. Each performed a 2 -min single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on a pediatric manikin using the vertical OHCC, once with the dominant hand (Test 1) and once with the non-dominant hand (Test 2). CPR parameters were recorded in real-time via sensors in the manikin, and the compression force exerted by each hand was measured using a force plate.Results: The mean and adequate CCD did not differ significantly between Test 1 and 2 (mean depth: 52 mm (in-terquartile range [IQR]: 49-57) in Test 1 vs. 52 mm (IQR: 49-57) in Test 2, P = 0.625; adequate depth: 97% (IQR: 37-100) in Test 1 vs. 92% (IQR: 51-99) in Test 2, P = 0.619). The mean compression force was significantly greater in the dominant hand compared to the non-dominant hand (23.1 kg +/- 4.9 in dominant hand vs. 21.7 kg +/- 4.1 in non-dominant hand, P < 0.001). Other parameters showed no significant differences between Tests 1 and 2.Conclusions: While vertical OHCC with a dominant hand generated greater force, the rescuer's handedness did not affect the CCD during the vertical OHCC.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available